Add note concerning startyear/endyear to get_pvgis_tmy #1362
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
get_pvgis_tmyresults don't match PVGIS website #1360- [ ] Tests added- [ ] Updates entries todocs/sphinx/source/api.rstfor API changes.- [ ] Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file indocs/sphinx/source/whatsnewfor all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with:issue:`num`or this Pull Request with:pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with:ghuser:`user`).The
get_pvgis_tmyfunction defaults to using all available years to generate the TMY, whereas the PVGIS website only allows for 10 years to be used. I propose to add a note explaining this difference to eliminate any confusion of why the results sometimes differ, e.g., #1360.Also, I changed a number of single-backticks to double-backticks as per the recommended convention.